跳至內容

討論:莫特問題

頁面內容不支援其他語言。
維基百科,自由的百科全書
          本條目頁屬於下列維基專題範疇:
物理學專題 (獲評低重要度
本條目頁屬於物理學專題範疇,該專題旨在改善中文維基百科物理學類內容。如果您有意參與,請瀏覽專題主頁、參與討論,並完成相應的開放性任務。
 未評級未評  根據專題品質評級標準,本條目頁尚未接受評級。
   根據專題重要度評級標準,本條目已評為低重要度

新條目推薦討論

在候選頁的投票結果

Untitled[編輯]

(:)回應,謝謝建議,已加入繁簡轉換。在物理學裏,簡體採用的是佯谬,參考全國科學技術名詞審定委員會。--老陳留言2013年3月27日 (三) 04:55 (UTC)[回覆]

Biased mistake about the spherical wavefunction[編輯]

  • initial fallacy: It is somewhat strange to think that a spherically symmetric wave function should be observed as a straight track, and yet, this occurs on a daily basis in all particle collider experiments.
  • correct physics: the wavefunctional sphere has internal variable (wavelike) probability density (-ies)

Sorry for not being Chinese. Don't delete my comment. Simply translate it in Chinese and improve the main text.

Mention that old physicists had an erroneous view which is NOT the correct view.

Quantum field theory and self-interactions are necessary for the analytical probability density variation description of the wavefunctional Everettian evolution (in most experiments a humongous amount of alternative solutions is possible; but it depends on the experiment).

The pre-collapse spherically symmetric wave function is the hypernymic/superordinate general/generic wave function. Each collapse (materialized solution) though is generated by a hyponymic/subordinate subfunction (sub-wave-function).


--以上未簽名的留言由2A02:587:4F08:B300:2560:22EF:C207:DB43討論)於2023年1月2日 (一) 06:57 (UTC)加入。[回覆]